If boycotting Israel: Ben & Jerry's should also cut ties with China
Ben & Jerry’s cares about ‘human rights’ only for progressives.
By Mario M. Kranjac
In a recent shocking interview, Ben & Jerry’s founders were stunned when they were confronted with their own corporate hypocrisy.
The interview focused on the company’s decision to stop sales in parts of Israel and when Axios reporter Alexi McCammond questioned them on why they were still selling in states that had laws that conflicted with their political views like Texas and Georgia, the two founders were speechless.
Ben & Jerry’s response is deeply concerning. You see, the Ben & Jerry’s parent company Unilever houses its American headquarters in Englewood Cliffs, NJ, where I serve as mayor. This discrimination is happening in my own back yard and it is critical that local and state leaders call out this half-baked publicity stunt for what it is: blatant corporate hypocrisy.
I was already disturbed when I saw the Ben & Jerry’s decision to boycott sales in parts of Israel, which is a free and democratic country. It seems the Axios reporter shared my confusion with their inconsistent business practices when she asked why boycott Israel while selling in Georgia where Ben & Jerry’s decried the state’s voting laws.
It turns out, Unilever uses the same avoidance tactics as their subsidiary. I discovered this when I sent a letter asking why Unilever remained silent as their subsidiary ceased sales in Israel, while their company continues to sell in countries like China where the government commits egregious human rights violations against religious minorities.
The answer I received from Unilever’s CEO Alan Jope stressed that “Unilever rejects completely and repudiates unequivocally any form of discrimination or intolerance,” but failed to address its involvement with these countries.
When will Unliver and Ben & Jerry’s denounce the Uyghur human rights crisis? When will they stop profiting off of Communist China’s policy of forcing millions into internment camps to endure harsh labor and torture, and committing genocide against men, women and children on account of their religious beliefs?
Probably never because while Unilever can afford to virtue signal on Israel, they can’t afford to upset the Chinese Communist Party. One of Unilever’s main suppliers is the state-owned company COFCO Tunhe Sugar Co., which is not only the largest exporter of tomato paste in China, but has been accused of thriving off of forced labor.
This isn’t Unilever’s first time using unethical treatment of workers in its supply chain either. In 2016, the company was caught exposing its workers to mercury at a thermometer plant in India. It seems that Unilever only cares to “advocate for human rights” when American progressives are paying attention.
Unilever and Ben & Jerry’s are happy to take discriminatory action against Israel because it’s politically convenient. In fact, it’s probably boosted their revenue from ideologically aligned consumers.
